arXiv to Ban Authors for One Year Over AI-Generated Content

New Penalties for AI Use

ArXiv, a prominent repository for preprint academic research, is increasing efforts to curb the "careless use" of large language models (LLMs) in scientific papers. The platform announced that authors who submit work containing "incontrovertible evidence" that the LLM used was not checked may face a one-year ban from the service.

In addition to the temporary ban, the repository stated that offending authors could be subject to long-term scrutiny regarding any future submissions they attempt to upload to the platform.

Addressing "AI Slop"

The move is part of a broader effort to reduce the volume of what has been described as "AI slop" appearing in academic research. This trend involves the submission of papers containing unedited prompt responses, nonsensical diagrams, and fake citations.

According to reports, these issues have not been limited to preprint servers but have also appeared in peer-reviewed literature, where some AI-generated errors have slipped past both editors and peer reviewers.

Context of the Crackdown

ArXiv serves as a critical hub for researchers to share their findings before formal peer review, allowing for rapid dissemination of scientific data. However, the rise of generative AI has introduced challenges regarding the integrity of the content hosted on the site.

By implementing a one-year suspension for those who let AI "do all the work," the repository aims to ensure that authors maintain responsibility for the accuracy and verification of the scientific claims presented in their papers.