newsnews.ai

Study Links Long Working Hours to Higher Obesity Rates

International research presented in Istanbul suggests a correlation between extended work hours and obesity, prompting calls for a four-day work week in the UK.

By NewsNews AI
Shakespeare's office worker Not the most enthusiastic progress towards a place of work I've ever seen. The view is of the Thames embankment on the south of the river looking towards Blackfriars Bridge
Shakespeare's office worker Not the most enthusiastic progress towards a place of work I've ever seen. The view is of the Thames embankment on the south of the river looking towards Blackfriars Bridge·Photo: Patrick Mackie via Wikimedia Commonscc-by-sa

Obesity and Working Hours Correlation

International research presented at the European Congress on Obesity in Istanbul has identified a link between long working hours and higher rates of obesity. The study analyzed working patterns and obesity prevalence across 33 OECD countries over a period spanning from 1990 to 2022.

According to the findings, countries with longer annual working hours, specifically the United States, Mexico, and Colombia, also exhibited higher obesity rates. The research suggests that individuals who work longer hours are more likely to be obese and that reducing the amount of time spent working could assist in weight management.

Calls for Policy Change

Following the presentation of these findings, campaigners have called on government ministers to introduce a four-day working week. Advocates argue that reducing the standard work week could mitigate the health risks associated with long hours.

This push for a shorter work week comes as other research challenges the efficiency of the traditional five-day model. A report from the nonprofit advocacy group 4 Day Week Global found that employees can accomplish the same amount of work in a 33-hour workweek as they do in a 38-hour workweek.

Evidence from UK Trials

Supporters of the four-day week point to previous large-scale trials in the United Kingdom. Between June and December 2022, more than 60 UK companies participated in a trial of the four-day work week. In this trial, 61 organizations committed to a 20% reduction in working hours for all staff for six months without a reduction in wages.

Research into the UK's largest trial of the four-day week revealed benefits for both employees and employers. Specifically, a trial within the public sector involving workers at Accountant in Bankruptcy and South of Scotland has reported an increase in productivity and improvements in staff well-being.

Context of Labor Trends

Researchers from the UKRI have noted that despite significant advances in technology, many employees continue to work approximately the same number of hours per week as workers did 100 years ago. This lack of reduction in hours despite technological gains forms part of the broader case for transitioning to a shorter work week.

Data from the 2022 UK trial indicates high levels of business satisfaction with the model, with more than 90% of participating businesses continuing or planning to continue the four-day week after the trial ended.

Sources (8)Open

Topics

How NewsNews AI made this storyOpen

NewsNews AI researched this story across 8 sources, drafted it, and ran the result through an independent editorial pass. It cleared editorial review on first pass.

  • 8 sources cited · linked in full at the bottom of the article
  • Image license verified · cc-by-sa
  • Independent editorial pass · approved

From the editor

All factual claims in the body and key facts are supported by their cited source snippets: the obesity-hours correlation and OECD country details trace correctly to source [1], the 4 Day Week Global productivity finding to source [4], the UK trial details (61 orgs, 20% hours reduction, no wage cut) to source [7], the 90%+ business continuation figure to source [6], the public sector pilot (Accountant in Bankruptcy) to source [2], and the "same hours as 100 years ago" observation to source [3]. Source [5] (Merriam-Webster definition of "expert") is not cited in the body, which is appropriate. No fabricated quotes, no single-source dependency, and the headline accurately reflects the content.

More about our editorial process

Feedback

We want to hear from you, especially when something is wrong. No signup, no email required.

Keep reading