Supreme Court Declines to Revive Carter Page Lawsuit Against James Comey
The high court refused an appeal from the former Trump campaign adviser seeking to hold individual FBI officials liable for surveillance errors during the 2016 Russia probe.

Supreme Court Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from Carter Page, a former adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The decision prevents the revival of a lawsuit Page had filed against former FBI Director James Comey and seven other former officials.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused herself from the decision. The ruling effectively ends Page's efforts to hold individual FBI leaders personally liable for surveillance errors conducted during the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Background of Surveillance and Lawsuit
Mr. Page was the target of secret surveillance, including wiretaps of his phone calls and emails, as part of the FBI's probe into whether the Trump campaign conspired with Russia to influence the election outcome. While Page was never charged with a crime, a Justice Department inspector general report later revealed that the court applications used to permit the surveillance contained errors and omissions.
According to reports, these inaccuracies made Mr. Page appear more suspicious than he actually was. A Justice Department watchdog investigation subsequently confirmed that the warrant applications were faulty.
Page filed suit against James Comey and seven other FBI officials as individuals, alleging "unlawful spying" based on these botched court applications. Separate claims brought by Page against the federal government were recently settled by the Trump administration.
Legal Basis for Dismissal
The lawsuit against individual officials had previously been rejected by lower courts. Those courts ruled that a three-year statute of limitations had expired, thereby barring Page's claims against the former FBI officials.
Page sought to have the Supreme Court overturn this dismissal and revive the case. By declining to hear the appeal, the high court leaves the lower courts' rulings in place, meaning Page has no further legal recourse to pursue these specific claims against Comey and his former colleagues.
Financial Settlement
While the lawsuit against individual officials has been shut down, Page reached a separate resolution with the United States government. Reports indicate that Page settled his claims against the U.S. for $1.25 million.
Sources (6)Open
- 1.Nytimes — Supreme Court Declines to Revive Carter Page Lawsuit Against James Comey - The New York Times
- 2.Nbcnews — Supreme Court rejects former Trump adviser Carter Page’s bid to revive James Comey lawsuit - NBC News
- 3.Cnn — Supreme Court dumps Trump aide Carter Page’s wiretapping suit against James Comey - CNN
- 4.Huffpost — Supreme Court Won't Revive Ex-Trump Aide's Suit Over Secret Surveillance During Russia Investigation - HuffPost
- 5.Newsweek — Supreme Court shuts down Carter Page’s final surveillance appeal - Newsweek
- 6.Greenwichtime — Supreme Court won't revive ex-Trump aide's suit over secret surveillance during Russia investigation - Greenwich Time
Topics
How NewsNews AI made this storyOpen
NewsNews AI researched this story across 6 sources, drafted it, and ran the result through an independent editorial pass. It cleared editorial review on first pass.
- 6 sources cited · linked in full at the bottom of the article
- Image license verified · cc0
- Independent editorial pass · approved
From the editor
Verified all key claims against source snippets. The Supreme Court's refusal to revive Page's lawsuit, the seven co-defendants alongside Comey, the statute of limitations dismissal by lower courts, the DOJ IG report findings, the $1.25 million settlement with the U.S. government, and Justice Jackson's recusal are all directly supported by the cited snippets. Citations are correctly attributed throughout the body and key facts. No fabricated quotes, no unsupported claims, no overreach detected.
Feedback
We want to hear from you, especially when something is wrong. No signup, no email required.
Keep reading

Supreme Court allows Alabama to use map eliminating majority-Black district
The U.S. Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal allowing Alabama to implement a congressional map that reduces the number of majority-Black districts.

Justice Clarence Thomas Refuses Stay on Alabama Redistricting Map
Justice Clarence Thomas denied an emergency application from Alabama officials seeking to block a lower court's ordered congressional map.

John Bolton to Plead Guilty in Classified Documents Case
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton has reached a plea deal with the Justice Department over the illegal retention of sensitive national security documents.